.
Feedback

New Legislation Passed to Protect Condo Owners’ Rights

New Legislation signed by Governor Malloy to provide protection to condo owners. Additonal bill pending.

Connecticut Governor Dannel P. Malloy has signed a bill that requires condo property managers to be certified and also blocks associations from prohibiting owners from placing religious symbols on their doors.

The bill, 5536, requires condo associations to allow small religious signs on individual owners’ doors. This issue is important because one condo association fined a Jewish owner because she violated the association’s rules by having a small Mezuzah on her door.

5536 also provides for new educational requirements and background checks for condo property managers. It is important because it will help assure that professionals hired by or working with condo owners will adhere to a high standard of conduct in their powerful positions working with condo associations.

Officials of the (click to sign up) Connecticut Condo Owners Coalition fought for the legislation, which had little opposition in the General Assembly. The Connecticut Chapter of the Community Associations Institute, which represents condo management companies and condo attorneys, also supported the bill.

The governor has yet to say whether he would sign a second condo legislation that is aimed at one condo complex in Southbury. 5511 would eliminate the requirement that more than 50 percent of condo owners must vote AGAINST a special assessment or annual budget for it to be defeated. The bill only applies to Heritage Village, in Southbury, with more than 2,400 units, because that is where the issue was particularly crucial.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Fairfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:48 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.
FHA Exposed June 18, 2013 at 01:54 pm
http://m.youtube.com/?reload=7&rdm=mokcsg2rc#/watch?v=Jcf0_3SA8xE
FHA Exposed June 18, 2013 at 01:51 pm
http://m.youtube.com/?reload=7&rdm=mokcsg2rc#/watch?v=Jcf0_3SA8xE