.
Feedback

Man Faces Drug Charges in Fairfield

Johnnie Newkirk of Bridgeport was arrested on Thursday.

[Editor's note: Arrest information is supplied by the Fairfield Police Department. It does not indicate convictions.]

A Bridgeport man faces drug charges after an officer spotted him Thursday in the backyard of a property he had no reason to be in, police said.

Johnnie Newkirk, 38, was reportedly seen coming from the backyard of a Villa Avenue home and then walking into the middle of the street after spotting the patrol car, according to the report.

Police were on alert because there area has experienced several car and residential break-ins, department spokesperson Sgt. Sue Lussier said.

Newkirk allegedly told police he knew he had no right to be on the property and he had urinated behind the house, according to the report. The officer noted that the man appeared nervous and was sweating, although it was cold out.  He conducted a pat down on Newkirk and found two bags of marijuana, a knife that was determined to be legal, and a white powdery substance, according to the report.

Newkirk was taken into custody and charged with possession of narcotics and possession of less than a half ounce of marijuana. He was released on a promise to appear in court on Jan. 10.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Fairfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:48 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.
FHA Exposed June 18, 2013 at 01:54 pm
http://m.youtube.com/?reload=7&rdm=mokcsg2rc#/watch?v=Jcf0_3SA8xE
FHA Exposed June 18, 2013 at 01:51 pm
http://m.youtube.com/?reload=7&rdm=mokcsg2rc#/watch?v=Jcf0_3SA8xE