.

Fairfield Weighs in on GOP Presidential Candidates

In honor of today's New Hampshire Primary, Patch asked locals for their thoughts on the Republican slate.

 

[The article has been updated to include an interview with State Rep. Brenda Kupchick.]

The Iowa Caucus has wrapped up; the New Hampshire Primary is underway today. The race to become the next president of the United States is heating up.

Readers can catch up on the caucus coverage on any Iowa Patch site (here’s a look at ) or follow the as our Granite State editors cover the New Hampshire Primary (check out Windham Patch).

But today, Fairfield Patch takes a step back and surveys how Fairfield feels about a major component of the 2012 presidential election -- the slate of Republican candidates vying for their party’s nomination.

Here’s how some residents answered the questions: “What do you think of the remaining Republican candidates, their campaigns? Who should get the GOP’s nomination?”

  • State Rep. Brenda Kupchick, R-132: "I personally lean toward Mitt Romney, but I see how people are supporting Newt and Paul. Newt is smart and an articulate person who has a clear message that resonates.  Ron Paul has a loyal following of supporters. I like Mitt because he's incredibly smart and has had success in turning failing companies around. Mitt is being attacked for being a moderate, but to me the majority of Americans don't want a hardcore partisan for their president. It seems during both parties' caucus and primaries partisanship is typical to win their party's nod, then all the candidates move back toward the middle to appeal to more voters. Many people I talk with are frustrated with the path the country has been on, myself included. I think Mitt Romney is an honest good man and I believe he will be a good president for the country."
  • Paul Anderson: “The one telling the least harmful lies.”
  • Bill Domeika, RTM member, R-9: Domeika said he did not have a clear-cut choice for who he feels should take the Republican Party’s nomination and, like many people, has been going through the Romney–Gingrich–Huntsman cycle. He said he knows he wants to see “someone who is electable. It sure seems like Romney will be that choice -- but I am still up in the air.”
  • Ellery Plotkin, Democratic Town Committee Chair: “The multitude of Republican candidates cannot seem to produce a frontrunner. It's been a revolving door of each one getting their 15 minutes of fame, except Romney who isn't going anywhere -- he seemingly has hit his glass ceiling.  The slate consists of mediocrity as a whole, each one pounding on a small spectrum of Republican best hits, yet all missing the comprehensive target.  There's only one candidate speaking to the American people, not just the Republican Party, and that's Huntsman.  Unfortunately for the Republicans, they'll never give him the ticket this year, because he appears, at least, balanced. The Republicans always shoot themselves in the foot, as they will this year, by picking a candidate that appeals to someone's unbalanced definition of a Republican, rather than appealing to a diverse population.  I further applaud the candidates' ignoring Reagan's 11th commandment. Fun to watch.”
  • Jim Baldwin, Republican Town Committee Chair: "We're happy to see the diversity of candidates," Baldwin said. "People are vetted; the system is showing it works. [The candidates] rise and fall based on the vetting process. It's a good competitive system...we'll see when the time comes what happens. Hopefully whoever comes out on top will be the right person."
  • Robert Clark: "Ron Paul is an extremist (fun to listen to though). And, as we are not Libertarians by design or nature, he becomes just another populist candidate sucking up votes on the right. Rick Santorum is the religious right. Not electable. Newt Gingrich has done more to disrupt the office of the speaker and create a divisive environment in Washington then any politician in recent memory and I will include George Wallace in there. Newt is morally, ethically, and politically bankrupt and everyone who served with him back in the day knows this. He is a disgrace. C'mon RNC, you folks can do better than Newt. Romney is a haircut posing as a politician. I have worked in business for thirty-five years and I can assure you he is just another corporate suit (see Oliver Stone's “Wall Street”). Does America really want a chief executive running the country? Does America not understand that Romney is the embodiment of the type and culture that caused the crash that got us into this mess in the first place? Oh please! Now that leaves the only candidate on that stage I would cast a vote for. Jon Huntsman is a very intelligent, calm, poised, experienced and elegant Washington politico with diplomatic insider street cred; and every time he opens his mouth shows the kind of class both on a world and domestic stage that we as Americans -- right or left, blue or red -- can be proud of. He is indeed a class act and an Obama-Huntsman debate would be very interesting from a political P.O.V. These two men are high-end thinkers and have our best interest at heart. Jon Huntsman would be the answer to your question.”

What do you think?

Bob MacGuffie January 10, 2012 at 01:54 PM
President Obama has revealed himself to be a Socialist, content to preside over and enable America's decline as the world's leading civilization. His refusal to contain the national debt, fatally bringing the Republic to bankruptcy is the proof of the case. There is no escape from the steel trap as our debt passes our GDP with no end in sight. The GOP needs to nominate a candidate who will call Obama what he is and cite the facts to make the case. Then Americans will be discussing between themselves whether Obama is a Socialist redistributor of the wealth we've all worked for. This is the conversation the Democrats want to avoid at all costs. Romney & Huntsman will avoid this conversation and if nominated will be played with by Obama and his media chorus until they run the clock out in Nov. The balance of the field is clearly imperfect, but will initiate the debate America needs as it teeters on the edge of historic decline.
Bobbie Herman January 10, 2012 at 03:34 PM
I'm really enjoying watching the Republican circus, but I miss Herman Cain. He was always good for a laugh. I wonder who will be the next one to emerge from the clown car. Caveat -- I am President of the Democratic Women of Westport.
Caitlin Mazzola (Editor) January 10, 2012 at 03:40 PM
Facebook feedback: Mark Lichtner said on the Fairfield Patch Facebook page: "I don't fully support any Republican candidate. However, ANYONE is better than President Obama,who the worst president in out lifetime by a country mile. I will support Romney because he had success as a Republican in a Democrtatic state. Even though ROMNEYCARE was/is wrong. Anyone but Obama."
KEVIN DILLON January 10, 2012 at 04:14 PM
I lean towards Newt who has the intelligence and the ideas needed in a very complicated world, especially with the global economy and the uprisings in the mideast. He has proven he can work with the other side when he helped balance the budget multiple years during the Clinton years. Romney would be my close second choice as my personal theory is Governor's often make good President's given their executive experience (Carter notwithstanding). It's hard to imagine either would lose to Obama given his dreadful record, unless a Ross Perot like 3rd party candidate would take 20% of the vote, most coming from the Republican candidate. Then we are screwed.
Pi January 10, 2012 at 09:02 PM
How is Obama the worst president? Are you kidding me? Were you asleep through the 8 years Dubya was in power? Were you asleep when Clinton was lying under oath? Were you asleep when Ronald Reagan pretty much undercut the working class while promising it would trickle down? Yeah, but Obama is the worst president ever. OH EM GEE!
Joe January 11, 2012 at 05:55 AM
Obama is the worst president ever? Really? Do we want to bring back the glory days of 600,000 job losses a month when he took office as opposed to the last 22 months of job growth? Yes, please bring back Osama Bin Laden, too. Please bring back DADT. Please bring back the endless war in Iraq. Please bring back an economy on the brink of collapse, 40 million uninsured, an auto industry in collapse, a stock market at 6,400. Those were the good old days before Obama. Are you really that blind to the progress that has been and is being made?
Fairfield Resident January 11, 2012 at 02:36 PM
The TRUTH Hurts Pi........it's time for you to accept it.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »