.
Feedback

Let's Make Guns as Cool as Smoking Cigarettes

'Patch In' columnist Heather Borden Herve draws parallels between the public awareness campaign about dangers of smoking and the concurrent push for tougher gun legislation — and suggests what you can do to help.

Remember when everybody smoked?

Think about the imagery associated with smoking, making it cool, as admirable and desirable as the rugged American cowboy.

According to an op-ed published in The New York Times, the rates of Americans who smoke have dropped dramatically since the 1960s — less than 20 percent of American adults smoke now, and it was more than twice as much 50 years ago. What’s more, the rate amongst younger smokers aged 18-24 is on the decline as well.

A lot of that happened because of aggressive marketing and awareness campaigns about the dangers of smoking cigarettes, both to smokers and victims of second-hand, “passive” smoke. There are now graphic warnings on cigarette packages; who can forget the advocacy ad campaigns picturing bodies lying on the New York City streets outside of tobacco company headquarters, representing the hundreds of thousands of people who died each year from smoking?

These efforts helped tremendously when cigarette manufacturers had to admit to Congress their efforts to conceal the dangers of the products they manufacture.

Know what else helped? Legislators heard from their constituents, and that made them feel brave enough to stand up to lobbyists and campaign donations from the big money tobacco industry.

Now if we can only get similar campaigns to hit hard at the gun lobby and gun industry. For it’s clear that the parallels run deep — the gun industry trades on making billions of dollars at the expense of 30,000 people who die each year due to gun violence, including eight children in the U.S. every day.

Supporters of laws aimed at making it harder to access military-style guns and ammunition were heartened when New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the SAFE Act, strengthening his states already strong gun laws. Clearly a threat to the big business of gun manufacturing, the NRA has stepped up its attacks on Cuomo, even though the law does not require gun owners to turn in their assault weapons, only register them. It did limit the sale of magazines to seven rounds within the state of New York, and strengthened background check requirements, among other changes.

Word coming out of Hartford isn’t as encouraging. Legislators had promised that legislation on gun safety and related security issues would be quick to come following the gun massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown on Dec. 14, 2012. The self-imposed deadline of the Newtown task force has come and gone, with little to show but frustration with — and amongst — Connecticut lawmakers.

So, too, is frustration growing with Congress amongst supporters of stronger, more comprehensive gun laws. Clearly, legislators who have been traditionally supported by NRA lobbyists are getting braver in their resistance, let alone less worried about how it look to voters as time passes since the shooting in Sandy Hook.

Case in point: Sen. John McCain answered a question about an assault weapons ban from a woman whose son was killed in the Aurora movie theater shooting. While he did express his sympathy to her, that condolence was followed by him saying, “I can tell you right now you need some straight talk. That assault weapons ban will not pass the Congress of the United States.”

[Author's note: While there’s been some back-and-forth in the press coverage of how video editing portrayed the Senator during the exchange and exactly how rude McCain was or wasn’t, I’d argue that no matter what, the parent of a gun massacre victim deserves more than the usual amount of restraint and courtesy, and I think the full clip shows the Senator was less respectful than he could have been.]

On March 13, there will be an event in Washington, DC, called “Moms Take The Hill,” led by a growing grassroots organization, Moms Demand Action. Their full title is actually “Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America,” and their mission emphasizes just that — common sense. They want to appeal to lawmakers to act on three very simple solutions to address rising gun violence in the United States, according to their website:

  • Ban assault weapons and ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds
  • Require background checks for all gun and ammunition purchases
  • Report the sale of large quantities of ammunition to the ATF and ban online sales of ammunition

If you can’t make it to Washington on the 13th, there’s still a way for you to get involved. Cut out and decorate eight paper dolls, representing the eight children who are shot and killed in America every day. There is a concerted social media campaign as part of this, to flood legislators emails and offices with images of the paper dolls, and you can find out more details by clicking here.

I began this column by writing, “Remember when everybody smoked?” Wouldn’t it be great if someday I could write a column that starts, “Remember when it was easy to buy a gun?”

Hopefully it won’t take as long as 50 years to see the gun violence rates drop as dramatically as smoking rates did.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Fairfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Frederick Klein March 6, 2013 at 04:56 pm
Gold's accusation against me is no one else's problem but Gold's. He still owes me an apology.
rottyfan March 6, 2013 at 05:19 pm
LMFAO, of course it makes no sense to you. You were trying your hardest, and still are, to vilify me. Makes perfect sense to me. I equate most ideas originating from the Left with excrement, so if the turd fits...
Joe March 6, 2013 at 05:22 pm
I just want to know from ANY of the people here seeking tighter gun laws these tow things.....
1. Is my rifle more dangerous with a pistol grip than without? 2. If reducing a magazine count to ten rounds is effective in reducing gun crime/violence, why not further limit them to six (like a revolver) and make a 'bigger' difference? This is simple stuff and if any of the gun-control folks here have coherent factual answers to these questions, I'll gladly accept them. All of the facts of this argument are on the side of the current laws being not only effective but also very limiting as they are now written.
Joe March 6, 2013 at 05:25 pm
Jim, we'd have a blast plucking the bad-guys chasing Frederick for his Birkenstocks!
Edmund Burke March 6, 2013 at 05:55 pm
We have not heard from Ludlowe today-probably on his way to Caracas for the funeral of Comrade Hugo.
Sandra March 6, 2013 at 06:04 pm
Ludlowe realized he embarrassed himself yesterday.
Joe March 6, 2013 at 06:13 pm
I'd expect this to get challenged in Scrabble and lose the points but Ludlowe is unembarrassable.
rottyfan March 6, 2013 at 06:31 pm
I don't see the value in the nonsense you spew. So now concealed permit holders have a value only if they risk their lives saving your lazy, pathetic self? That's might selfish of you. You can't have it both ways. You refuse to acknowledge that the government is not obligated to provide an individual personal protection so you can demand out of the other end of your orifice that law-abiding citizens be disarmed or try to shame them for taking ownership of their responsibility to provide their own personal protection.
Of course I wouldn't help you. You are more fearful of an armed, law-abiding woman riding in an elevator and would rather enable the rapist standing next to her instead. And whether you're too dense to see it, or not, concealed permit holders provide a form of security to gun-haters like you for which you are ungrateful. Criminals may not be the smartest, but they know the math that counts; they have to factor in the odds that their next victim just might be carrying a concealed weapon and could send them straight to hell. So what is your preferred method of self defense? That a CC permit holder come to your aid, 911, or deploying bulletproof ninja sKiLz? Make sure you keep that rape whistle on a lanyard around your neck.
R. Ludlowe March 6, 2013 at 06:48 pm
Wow... SOMEONE woke up on the wrong side of the paper target today...
R. Ludlowe March 6, 2013 at 06:50 pm
That's OK, because SHDad, Sandra, and everyone else have AR-15's to combat Obama's government. I am sure that they will have no problem repelling a drone attack.
R. Ludlowe March 6, 2013 at 06:51 pm
I cant see that any of those issues make your gun any difference, though I definitely support some type of magazine limit. If most of you only use your guns for target practice, why do you need a huge magazine?
R. Ludlowe March 6, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Sorry, unlike y'all I actually have a grown up job with "responsibility."
You'd like to pick up where we left off yesterday?
rottyfan March 6, 2013 at 06:54 pm
Wow, SOMEONE didn't take Imodium for their keyboard today.
Joe March 6, 2013 at 06:54 pm
Most ARs fire the .223 caliber which is, at best, an intermediate round. The big scary AR is not very useful for big stuff like deer, bear, elk or drones. I'd probably use the .30-06 bolt action for a drone.
R. Ludlowe March 6, 2013 at 06:54 pm
unembarrassable: good word in my book.
And I'm flattered that you think I cannot be embarrassed. I certainly can embarrass myself in some ways, but no... nothing on this page or any other Patch page would actually embarrass me. I'm embarrassed by much of what I read, but that is a reflection on our culture and the actual authors.
R. Ludlowe March 6, 2013 at 06:56 pm
From what I heard, the horrible damage that was done to a bunch of 6 and 7 year olds in Newtown was the 'worst thing' the medical examiner had ever seen. What size bullets did he use?
Joe March 6, 2013 at 07:01 pm
Ludlowe,
I appreciate an honest reply, thanks. Here is my counter - the current proposal from the CT Democrats will outlaw a gun with a pistol grip even though its sister gun (without said grip) would still be acceptable. The magazine should not be measured by 'need' but by convenience. Why make it necessary to carry three 10's instead of two 15's....my point is, what's the point? I liken it to a 10 gallon gas tank....what's the point? I probably won't drive less. I'd be only inconvenienced by the nuisance of it.
Frederick Klein March 6, 2013 at 07:05 pm
I don't try to vilify you. Unless I'm reading this board and you post something, I don't think of you at all.
Joe March 6, 2013 at 07:06 pm
I went to 13 of the wakes, my went to 22 of them (teacher at SHS). It was the worst thing I've ever seen. It wouldn't have mattered what caliber they were, some of the bullets actually went through and embedded into others. A horrendous, disgusting and pathetic tragedy. Every bullet was a .223 except for a single 10MM with which he shot himself.
rottyfan March 6, 2013 at 07:09 pm
I'm surprised Ludlowe didn't repeat this gem when I asked him what were the lethal differences between a Mini-14 and AR-15 since both chamber the same round and accept detachable magazines: "Rotty, I dont know, and frankly, I could care less."
And as predictable as a watch, he turns to magazine size and why anyone would need it. Ludlowe's an expert on magazines and why these "huge" magazines are inherently evil and need to be scaled down to 10 rounds because: A) If a homeowner needs to defend his life from an intruder, limiting rounds to 10 so that the homeowner has to reload, because "reloading is distracting, you never know what might have happened in that time period" and may give the attacker a chance to overpower or kill the homeowner. B) Out of the other end of his mouth comes this: A criminal can kill with a "10-bullet magazine just as easy as you could with a 30-bullet magazine."
Edmund Burke March 6, 2013 at 07:15 pm
Hola-welcome back to the land of the free and home of the brave.
rottyfan March 6, 2013 at 07:18 pm
LMFAO @Edmund Burke. It also looks like that Cuban healthcare ain't what it's cracked up to be.
Joe March 6, 2013 at 07:20 pm
I don't know rotty....I'm satisfied with the results of the Cuban Healthcare system today!
Edmund Burke March 6, 2013 at 07:25 pm
Now if we can only get Sean Pen to sign up for Castrocare.
Charlie March 6, 2013 at 09:34 pm
All - a Second Amendment Rally will occur at Hartford, Monday, March 11, 10-4.
http://ccdl.us/component/content/article/38-news/240-lobby-day-at-the-capitol Pass the word.
Joe March 6, 2013 at 09:36 pm
And maybe Oliver Stone and Danny Glover. Comrade Hugo would recommend......
Frederick Klein March 6, 2013 at 09:41 pm
Remember to bring your guns.
Edmund Burke March 6, 2013 at 11:47 pm
Sorry, FK
No birkenstocks or sweater vests.
Joe March 7, 2013 at 12:29 am
What I've been saying all along.....
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/city-looks-make-gun-ownership-mandatory/nWhgr/
voteDEMout! March 7, 2013 at 03:18 am
1342 Community Organizer days left. Yahoo! :-)
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Creeky June 18, 2013 at 08:46 pm
FHA Exposed, you can rest. She turned herself in:Read More http://www.justice.gov/usao/ct/Press2013/20130604.html If you are looking for some comeuppance for those that kept this quiet, and handled what they could out of the public's eye, I wish you success in your endeavors, and the best of luck--I think you'll need it.
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 10:21 pm
Creeky - For a dead guy, I try to keep busy: http://wilton.patch.com/blogs/thomas-paines-blog
Creeky June 18, 2013 at 10:59 pm
Thomas, you certainly do. I enjoyed "Outside the Box."
FHA Exposed June 18, 2013 at 01:51 pm
http://m.youtube.com/?reload=7&rdm=mokcsg2rc#/watch?v=Jcf0_3SA8xE
Creeky June 18, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Atticus, Ralph Arnone is next scheduled to appear in court on July 1st, at which point he isRead More expected to enter a plea. As an aside, one isn't supposed to go to bed and wake up still angry at the same thing, day in, day out, week in, week out, month in, month out... I'm not trying to give you a hard time. I care deeply about firefighters and I'm genuinely concerned about you. You were exposed to a lot of chemicals in your career. You may have some endocrine system damage or something causing an electrolyte disorder. This stuff starts out with things like joint pain and minor psychological implications but, it gets much, much worse. Get to the doc. Maybe you're just a spicy guy, maybe Ralph hurt you in some terrible way, or maybe you are sick and as a result, you'll be facing a much shortened a painful life. Honestly, I'm not trying to give you a hard time or pick a fight.