.

Letter: ‘Town’s Disregard for Taxpayer Money is Disgraceful’

Dear Editor,

The Penfield One rebuilding committee opened their 1/9/14 meeting with the statement that they were not concerned with flooding as part of their job. This is the same disregard the original building committee showed toward flooding. Why should the public expect different results from the same process that didn’t work the first time? This moral disregard by the town to allow over 5 million dollars of taxpayer money to be spent on the building of the pavilion without regard for minimizing flooding behind the beaches is disgraceful.  For a second Penfield One committee to again state that they were not concerned about flooding is doubly disgraceful. Whose responsibility is it to responsibly spend your tax dollars? One would have thought that the selectman elected to represent all voters would have made that a high priority, and one the committees would welcome as they were appointed to represent all of Fairfield’s taxpayers, not just the ones living beyond the flood plain behind the beaches. The homes behind the beach sustained greater monetary damages than the pavilion, even after insurance payments.

The pavilion occupies the low ground between the dune to the East on Rickard’s Beach and the stone seawall on the West between Penfield One and Two. This is a considerable “hole in the dike” area. To allow water to freely flow through this area during Sandy without the protection of the current seawall, which wasn’t built as recommended by the town’s Flood and Erosion Board, would have caused Sandy to flood all the way to the center of town.

I contend that the current seawall protected the pavilion on the incoming tide from the waves and slowed the flooding of the area behind the beaches. Regrettably, the receding waters found the flaw in the original design of the pavilion and the seawall the engineers told us wasn’t there. However, I believe both of these flaws are fixable and can live in harmony.

The flood waters from Sandy (the largest storm ever recorded in the Atlantic and the largest to hit Fairfield since 1938) were again slow to drain because the town has been studying the recommendation of the F&E board since 1992, when they recommended the installation of a series of sluice gates in the town built dike designed by engineers to keep water out, but with disregard for getting water out that got behind it from big storms. This dike is located between the fire training station and Fairfield Beach Rd. It traps the flood waters that fill the entire flood plain behind it from receding. That is 22 years of studying. An additional $20,000 was spent since Sandy to an engineering firm to confirm that this is the right idea. Time to build it before the next big storm.

The F&E board has offered its assistance to the rebuilding Committee. Hopefully the two will work in harmony as we move forward.

Penfield One is a town facility that should be enjoyed by all that paid for it, without endangering those that live behind it or the town infrastructure that exists in this fragile area. I urge all who agree that flood protection can and must coexist with any rebuilding of the pavilion to email their thoughts to penfieldcommittee@town.fairfield.ct.us

Signed,

Rick Grauer
Chairman Flood & Erosion Board

Igor January 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM
John that is a very broad statement. Which departments are you referring to. There are some very hard workers that work for the people of Fairfield. To group them all together is wrong.
Joeseph Biff January 17, 2014 at 12:37 PM
Wait until the new BOE and town budgets comes out. Watch your taxes go up,up,up!
Creeky January 19, 2014 at 08:16 PM
Thanks for your letter Rick. I've been trying to understand this better. Does the F&E Board, by any chance, have a package put together that lays out these recommendations. Perhaps a map, and some arrows and notes. If so, can we request it at the library, see it online, or send an SASE for a copy? These matters are really quite complex, likely with competing interests, e.g. Homeowners, Conservation, Shellfish, Penfield One Rebuilding Committee, budget constraints in general. The devil is always in the details and I think the more all present their case, the better we can find compromise and move away from the adversarial approach that has become so commonplace in Fairfield Government. Anyway, if there is a package available, I'd love to view it and give it due consideration. Please do let us know. Thanks.
Igor January 20, 2014 at 08:22 AM
Our local government does not represent anyone but themselves. The motto being "What's good for me is good for me".
Joeseph Biff January 20, 2014 at 08:39 AM
I read a recent article in the Citizen News that 10% of our students receive free lunches.Amazing. What's the criteria for getting s free lunch? Title asking for 3.78% increase. Ouch!!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »