.

Selectmen Uphold Hiller's Resignation Agreement

The board also discussed the price tag associated with the contract.

With the Board of Selectmen's vote on the pact Wednesday, the debate on the agreement between First Selectman Michael Tetreau and former Chief Fiscal Officer Paul Hiller is over -- for now.

Tetreau and Selectman Cristin McCarthy Vahey voted to uphold the pact, while Selectman Kevin Kiley voted against it. The question was called before going to public comment.

The vote was placed on the agenda at the board's Sept. 19 meeting at the behest of Kiley, though Town Attorney Stanton Lesser cautioned a vote would likely have little sway over the validity of the pact.

"The time and effort we put into this is well worth it," Kiley said before the vote.

The board publicly picked apart the price tag on the agreement, which Tetreau released prior to Tuesday's Board of Finance meeting.

The general release and settlement agreement for Hiller to retire earlier than he originally planned costs the town $127,768, and Tetreau clarified that the salary portion is at or below what was already budgeted for the current fiscal year.

The $127,768 is comprised of:

  • An estimated $10,000 in legal fees;
  • $52,090 in pension payments based on the salary adjustment made to Hiller's salary in the agreement (bumped from $134,591 to $155,600 to compensate for retiring early). The pension payouts will not affect the current year's budget, Tetreau said, and are spread out against future budgets.
  • $33,632 for a severance payout;
  • $31,046 for 60 days of unused vacation;
  • $1,000 for a deferred compensation payout.

Kiley also asked Tetreau who introduced the non-disparagement clause included in the contract.

According to Tetreau, the clause was "represented as a standard clause for this type of agreement," and was included in the draft agreed upon by both side's attorneys.

The First Selectman maintained that the bottom line with the situation surrounding Hiller's resignation is that the Finance Department's work will get done, a notion McCarthy Vahey echoed.

The town remaining financially protected and the work getting done is "really important to us, and to all the boards" in Fairfield, McCarthy Vahey said.

Jim Eastwood October 04, 2012 at 11:36 AM
Mr Hiller Good Luck !!!! you can do the job in Shelton !!!! WOW what a surprise !!!! lets see 2 Democrats to ! Republican and thats how the vote ends up???? WOW !!!!!!!!! I never expected that !! Have a Great Day(and Pay and Pay your taxes !!!)
Creeky October 04, 2012 at 12:37 PM
Why is the deal the main concern of the RTM? Shouldn't it be questioning Tetreau on what exactly is the change of direction he is trying to accomplish in replacing Hiller? Pensions? Healthcare? Borrowing? What is it Mike? What are you trying to do? This whole deal is really pushing me to the view held by some, there is far too much power centered in the First Selectman's office. We need leadership, not a dictator. We need a more open approach, lest we follow along and get duped again, like we were by the previous administration.
Laura October 04, 2012 at 02:09 PM
Well, we won't know because the First Selectman said yesterday he is through answering questions about this - he's already spent too much time (I think he said 6 hours) in various meetings being questioned about this. I was amazed at the quick move by him to avoid any discussion at the Selectman meeting yesterday. After every single agenda item the public was asked if they had questions. After that one, due to a quick move by the Tetreau/McCarthy Vahey team any public questions/comments were blocked. So, even though we're not satisfied, he is. Of course not to worry, Mr. Tetreau is committed to "transparency and congeniality".
Laura October 04, 2012 at 02:09 PM
Well, we won't know because the First Selectman said yesterday he is through answering questions about this - he's already spent too much time (I think he said 6 hours) in various meetings being questioned about this. I was amazed at the quick move by him to avoid any discussion at the Selectman meeting yesterday. After every single agenda item the public was asked if they had questions. After that one, due to a quick move by the Tetreau/McCarthy Vahey team any public questions/comments were blocked. So, even though we're not satisfied, he is. Of course not to worry, Mr. Tetreau is committed to "transparency and congeniality".
Chris October 04, 2012 at 07:53 PM
Forget the McCarthy and make it Tetreau-Vahey, two schemers, as Cristin and Mike are one in the same. In one quick devious move Cristin showed her true colors and called the question immediately ending the discussion and WOULD NOT allow public comment. No public comment on a controversial contract. Thanks for nothing Cristin. You never pulled this political machine garbage at the RTM.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »